Raising the Bar annotated bibliography

stats-ed

This way or data-way? A survival guide for a world of data. Selected notes, sources and further reading related to my talk.

Kia ora! If you found your way here through my talk, thank you so much for coming. Skip down to the annotated bibliography. If you found this some other wayā€¦welcome! There is some information on the event below, including links to listen.

Event information

Abstract

What do motivational posts on LinkedIn have in common with the supposedly small feet of Victorians? Join Dr Liza Bolton as she explores the habits of statistical thinking that can make our day-to-day lives better ā€“ from picking a restaurant like a statistician, to why you shouldnā€™t necessarily believe a bus stop advertisement when it tells you your hometown is one of New Zealandā€™s most monogamous. There are no mathematics prerequisites here ā€“ number lovers and loathers alike are invited on a romp through the good, the bad and the ugly from a world full of data and decisions.

Bio

Dr Liza Bolton teaches statistics and data science at the University of Auckland, having recently returned from three years at the University of Toronto in Canada. She is also a statistical consultant, though tends to prefer the term ā€œdata ambassadorā€ to describe her work representing peopleā€™s data back to them in meaningful ways. Her interests lie in the realms of health, equity and education, with her research focusing on statistics education and applied statistics, specifically exploring social anVd economic predictors of mortality in Aotearoa.

Listen [54:07]

Listen on SoundCloud or Spotify.

Annotated bibliography

The formatting of this is probably a bit loose for a real ā€˜annotated bibliographyā€™ ā€” think of it as somewhere between one of those and a very lazy blog post.

ā€œThe best thing about being a statistician, is that you get to play in everyoneā€™s backyard.ā€ ~ John Tukey

Brillinger, D. R. (2014). ā€œā€¦ how wonderful the field of statistics isā€¦ā€. In Lin, X., Genest, C., Banks, D.L., Molenberghs, G., Scott, D.W., & Wang, J.-L. (Eds.). Past, Present, and Future of Statistical Science (1st ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16720

Te Awamutu: The Rose Monogamy Town of New Zealand? šŸŒ¹šŸ‘©šŸ»ā€šŸ¤ā€šŸ‘ØšŸ½

Turns out you canā€™t trust ā€˜big garlicā€™ šŸ§„ā€¦or ā€˜big ergonomic chairā€™

I am a big fan of Hayden Donnellā€™s work and the below Mediawatch episode from a year ago is no exception! It is a 9ā€™31ā€ listen and looks at the rise of coverage of ā€˜researchā€™ provided by organisations that is intended as advertising much more than as an original contribution to human knowledge.

Importantly, the above story notes: ā€œjournalists who might have questions about a studyā€™s credibility [should] contact the publicly-funded Science Media Centre for advice.ā€ For transparency, Iā€™ll note that I am listed on the SciMex directory and have been paid for a workshop for a Data Journalism program they were running.

Donā€™t tell me what the data says, the data says shit

The We All Count project for equity in data science has some incredible ā€˜merchā€™ to share some key ideas about their mission, to ā€œwork towards a world where data science is good, and good for everyoneā€.

This is one of my favourites:

Data Canā€™t Actually Speakā€¦ Art Print Direct link to poster

Our world imperfectly becomes data

ā€œOur world imperfectly becomes data. If we are to use data nonetheless to learn about the world, then we need to actively seek to understand their imperfections and the implications of those imperfections.ā€ ~ Rohan Alexander

ā€œThere are three kinds of lies: Lies, damned lies, and statisticsā€ ~ Mark Twain (attributing it to Benjamin Disreali, who may not have said itā€¦and everyone attributes it to Twain now, except for me who gave the WRONG attribution in my bFM interview ā€” the shame! šŸ˜³)

Twain, M. Chapters from My Autobiography. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/19987/19987-h/19987-h.htm. Published 1906. Accessed August 27, 2024.

The statistical-thinking bogs

The following is about students in intro stats classes, but I think it is also really helpful for checking in on your own thinking and anticipating how others may engage with your communication about data.

ā€¦students tend to enter and leave most introductory statistics courses thinking of statistics in one of at least two incorrect ways:

1. Students believe that statistics and mathematics are similar in that statistical problems have a single correct answer; an answer that tells us indisputable facts about the world we live in (Bog #1: overconfidence) (Nicholson & Darnton, 2003; Pfannkuch & Brown, 1996),

or,

2. Students believe that statistics can be ā€˜made to say anything,ā€™ like ā€˜magic,ā€™ and so cannot be trusted. Thus, statistics is viewed as disconnected and useless for scientific research and society (Bog #2: disbelief) (Martin, 2003; Pfannkuch & Brown, 1996).

Tintle, N., Chance, B., Cobb, G., Roy, S., Swanson, T., & VanderStoep, J. (2015). Combating Anti-Statistical Thinking Using Simulation-Based Methods Throughout the Undergraduate Curriculum. The American Statistician, 69(4), 362ā€“370. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24592138

šŸ“„ PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1508.00543.pdf

Two AI images generated by DALLE 2 from the prompt "dramatic oil painting of a swamp"
Two AI images generated by DALLE 2 from the prompt ā€œdramatic oil painting of a swampā€. The left is labelled ā€˜bog of overconfidenceā€™ and the right is labelled ā€˜bog of disbeliefā€™.

Picking a restaurant like a statistician (and reading political polls)

Motivational memes, the small feet of Victorians and armouring planes

ā€œYou miss 100% of the shots you donā€™t takeā€ ~ Wayne Gretzky

A grid of 15 'famous failures' from www.TheQuotes.net Image source

If you liked this talkā€¦

ā€¦or if you didnā€™t, but like statistics and statistical thinking!

Poster for Farah Hancock's 2024 Ihaka Lecture on Thursday 19 September. Farah is a Data/Longform journalist with RNZ and her talk is titled 'Putting feelings into figures'.

ā€œScience is not a magic wand that turns everything it touches to truth. Instead,ā€science operates as a procedure of uncertainty reduction,ā€ said Nosek, of the Center for Open Science. ā€œThe goal is to get less wrong over time.ā€ This concept is fundamental ā€” whatever we know now is only our best approximation of the truth. We can never presume to have everything right.ā€ ~ Christie Aschwanden